Monday, November 22, 2010

Strawberry Bikini Playground

bridges and purpose of national parks - a letter of Franco Zunino

Subject:
Competition for a project to create a "Tibetan Bridge" in the City of Castelsaraceno (power) between the National Park Appennino Lucano - Val d'Agri - and Lagonegrese Parco Nazionale del Pollino .


national parks of the South are still coming in more and more disturbing news about the meaning in our country gives to these institutions. It seems that all the administrations, especially those municipalities which at the time, without understanding that a National Park is primarily a constraint on the land and environment and urban development initiative, have agreed to join. Every municipality is inventing the wildest projects, projects which should never be made into a park for more public money.


The last news came to the writer's Association is a competition for a project to bridge the Tibetan "in the spectacular gorges of the Racanelli (the only part of this torrent remained intact), funded by the Operational Programme Val d'Agri. The total budget for the project would be one million euro (and then tell us that there is a crisis and who do not know where to cut the budget law, and there are also those who complained about cuts to the National Parks!).


The bridge would link the center of the Castelsaraceno rocky ridge known as "Castel Old Man" and the Monte Raparo.

The project has already been inserted by the National Park of Lucan, in the 2010/2013 three-year program of public works to be carried out with funds for National Parks in integrated tourism offer Lagonegrese Val d'Agri-.

a scandal! To require the repeal of the National Park contrast with its primary purpose!

Perhaps it would be the case that the Ministry of Environment provvedesse to alert these authorities to the purpose of a National Park are other, and that it would be better that the administration of the Park to a provvedesse three-year program for the conservation of natural beauty and biodiversity values \u200b\u200bthat each National Park has a duty to preserve. The National Park was not for school "three-year plans for tourism development," meaning all the works to build the craziest and impacting on landscape and environment that works just a National Park is intended to prohibit.

A National Park is not a growth industry! Conservation and development are at odds, and prove you are all the major and most important national parks in the world, and especially the historical ones that are the basis of their concept.

Perhaps the leaders of these Parks South are also wrong to propose to them the place they occupy, perhaps they were intended rather politicized to public agencies, and believed they found in a park the public body usually indulge themselves in which to find funding for projects as varied as they get even money and the money can be procurement of works!

Perhaps it's someone who informs them that they should take public money primarily to purchase or obtain in the management of natural terrain parks. Because this is what the countries of the Parks when historians set up a park or any other protected area!

With best regards.
THE SECRETARY-GENERAL
; ; ; (Franco Zunino)


Posted by admin at 7:16 AM

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)