Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Blueberry Buckle Baby Food Recipe

Marsicano Marsicano: continuous squandering of money on useless research

PRESS

Brown Bear Marsicano

La Grande Bouffe MONEY AGAIN ...
AND 'CIRCUS' NEW STUDIES AND RESEARCH
BUT THE BEARS ARE ALWAYS LESS
And we all hope for ... GOD!


There is nothing worse than continue their obstinacy and error. A distance of only a few months of the announcement of the National Park of Abruzzo with whom he communicated the termination (infine!) of searches that have raged for at least a decade, with the "marking" identification and "collarizzazione" of almost all bears survived, in fact, using a form of domestication virtual (because when you give each bear a name as used by the researchers - rather than merely anonymous initials - it has already taken the first and most subtle of all conditionings' man, after that the "syndrome of Yellowstone" that raged for years, unfortunately with a growing more and more every year). Everything always with the belief that knowing the exact number of bears, they begin to copulate for divine intervention to reproduce so quickly and give satisfaction to researchers and the authorities of the park (which, if they actually happen, do not hide, would also us great happiness!). Ultimately, it claims to save the bear, but has never really done anything concrete to achieve this result : only studies, research, analysis and counting! "Firing" always against hunting and hunters and requiring the usual continuous expansion of the park, as if it were a panacea, when most of the problems are just in it.

After the permissions granted, or the silence and lack of opposition, on many farms and solar projects that are threatening the entire national park and the habitat of the brown Marsicano, authorizations or not contrasted with guilty silence (perhaps because the projects considered "green"!) and after the failure, at least in fact, the PATOM (and the proof is that the agreement between all the high-sounding, is not the first reason, and indisputable priority for reject each type of project that threatens the habitat of the bear), that's not many days ago the authorities have gathered in Rome for a "PATOM encore. A PATOM for a while allowed to find other funding € 3.6 million with which to start the whirlwind of money, after more than € 13 million already to no avail (but only for the bear!) Spent up to today!

In practice, while one hand is believed to satisfy the public with initiatives unnecessary and silly as planting apple trees and grafting of wild ones home, to say nothing of seedlings Ramna, will resume from tomorrow research and counting, the catch and the satellite triangulation!

research that can only end with the most trivial of the results, which, without all that money wasted (but not for those who have published scientific studies, although useful for those who sign them), the undersigned answers he had given forty years ago with a cost little money without the help of radio collars and satellite receivers, travel advice abroad, participation in conferences, etc.. (When there were plenty of bears still over 100 and it was therefore widely in time to save them). Here they are, the conclusions must be must be received these new studies, and once again they are listed for future reference:

1) Creating Wilderness Areas (or areas of severely closed) which prevent drastically hiking tourism throughout the year or at least in the critical season for all, and not with access for a fee.

2) crops to lose in all areas of agriculture (or former agriculture) surrounding areas of the region's primary natural environment for the life of the bear.

3) Incentives for grazing sheep to go back to being parte integrante della ruralità della regione primaria per la vita dell’orso. E, in alternativa o comunque integrativamente, acquisto di greggi “pubblici” da far pascolare a spese del Parco anche nelle aree più critiche e delicate, prive di cani ed alla libera disposizione degli orsi.

4) Blocco totale per ogni progetto di antropizzazione e/o urbanizzazione della regione primaria per la vita dell’orso, con un “non luogo a procedere” di principio per ogni progetto che fosse presentato.

5) Indennizzo immediato, integrale (ovvero compreso i danni indiretti) per any losses that farmers and herdsmen suffer from bears, wolves or even dogs - because if there are stray or feral dogs, head first - as claimed by the former guard "Lillino" Finamore - it is however, the Park Authority, which fails to catch them or elimination.

6) Drastic reduction of the presence of a boar (seriously competitive on the feed with the bear) and the containment of the deer (factor of major impact on forest vegetation and natural disturbance in general and for the bear).

Instead, perhaps we will once again see that part of the 3.6 million euro will be allocated to that found Bear Marsicano, ending up in the pockets of scholars and researchers, for appropriate compensation for those who work, but that's nothing new to take concrete and immediate aid for life (the survival!) bear. While there are not any money for the campaign in favor of the bear food, to reimburse farmers and shepherds and cuts to prevent forest with rent and compensation.

Hopefully you have already got their hands on the fact that according to scholars only as a threshold of 3.2% is what separates the Marsicano Bear the risk of extinction, is not the prelude to propose that for years has been an "ancient" mind of many: revitalize the population with inputs of Slovenian bears , which would ensure endless research opportunities to researchers, but unleash a revolution popular among the people of Abruzzo, which require that the authorities save the brown bear Marsicano, not a hybrid, not a "bear any remains that while the bear" as you will end up thinking along the lines of Trentino, where However, the genetic situation (and perhaps the character) is very different!

Murialdo, February 23, 2011
IL SEGRETARIO GENERALE
F.to Franco Zunino
     Già studioso dell’Orso bruno marsicano

0 comments:

Post a Comment